When a carrier unreasonably delays or denies a valid claim, Colorado's bad faith statute (C.R.S. § 10-3-1116) allows the policyholder to recover two times the covered benefit, plus attorney's fees and court costs. We turn an obstructed claim into a statutory remedy, and force the carrier to pay what it should have paid the first time, with consequences attached. Direct attorney access.
Under C.R.S. § 10-3-1116, when an insurer unreasonably delays or denies a covered claim, the policyholder can recover twice the covered benefit, plus reasonable attorney's fees and court costs. This is the rare statute that meaningfully reverses the carrier's leverage. We file when the facts support it.
Colorado law treats unreasonable delay as bad faith, not just unreasonable denial. Carriers know that and use it, slow-walk the claim, keep requesting documents, miss decision deadlines, hope the policyholder gives up. We document the timeline carrier by carrier and turn the delay itself into the case.
Beyond the statutory remedy, Colorado recognizes a separate common-law bad faith claim, which can carry emotional distress damages, consequential damages, and pre-judgment interest. Where the facts support both, we plead both, the statutory and the common-law claim work together, not as alternatives.
I founded VENYX to challenge the settlement-mill model. At the high-volume firms, you're often just a file number managed by a revolving door of case managers. You might not speak to your actual attorney until the day the case settles, if ever.
Bad faith cases are won and lost on the paper trail. Every delay, every shifting reason for denial, every demand for "just one more document" is evidence. When you hire me, I personally manage the carrier correspondence, track the response timeline, and build the bad faith record in parallel with the underlying claim, so when we file, the statute does the heavy lifting on damages.
Most injury firms still operate on bloated staff and outdated systems, and either ignore technology or charge you extra for it. VENYX is built on a modern, digital-first foundation. We don't pay for inefficiency, so neither do you. That's how we deliver elite representation starting at a 29% fee.
Every major insurer maintains internal records on the attorneys they deal with. They track who files lawsuits and who folds at the negotiating table. That reputation follows every case before a single demand letter goes out.
"Settling isn't the goal. Maximum recovery is the goal. Sometimes those are the same thing. Sometimes they're not. The insurance company already knows which kind of attorney they're dealing with before you walk in the door." Dylan Unger, Founder, VENYX Injury Law
Most Denver bad faith firms charge a 33-35% standard fee and jump to 40-45% if they have to sue. Venyx charges a 29% standard fee and 33% if we have to sue. A lean, technology-driven practice doesn't need to overcharge you to survive.
The firm never makes more than the client. At every fee level, you keep more of your recovery than we do.
| Your Recovery | Industry Standard (33-35%) | Venyx 29% Standard | You Keep More |
|---|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $17,500 | $14,500 | +$3,000 |
| $100,000 | $35,000 | $29,000 | +$6,000 |
| $250,000 | $87,500 | $72,500 | +$15,000 |
| $500,000 | $175,000 | $145,000 | +$30,000 |
Venyx fee structure: 29% standard, 33% if a lawsuit is filed. Client is responsible for case costs.
Calculate how much you can saveUninsured and Underinsured Motorist claims are the single largest source of bad faith litigation in Colorado. Your own carrier, which you paid premiums to for years, suddenly questions your injuries, demands repeated examinations, and lowballs the offer. We turn unreasonable delay or denial of a UM/UIM claim into statutory damages.
Talk to DylanMedical Payments coverage is meant to pay medical bills promptly, regardless of fault, while the larger liability claim is sorted out. Carriers that slow-walk, partially pay, or refuse to pay valid Med-Pay submissions create textbook bad faith exposure. These claims are often clean and statutorily attractive.
Talk to DylanAfter a hailstorm, fire, or water loss, carriers often deny coverage entirely or undervalue the loss by tens of thousands of dollars. Improper investigation, misapplication of policy exclusions, and "depreciation" tactics that don't fit the policy language are common patterns. We pursue the underlying claim and the bad faith claim in parallel.
Talk to DylanIn a third-party context, where the at-fault driver's insurer unreasonably refuses to settle within policy limits and exposes their own insured to excess judgment, an assignment-of-rights claim can let the injured party pursue the carrier directly. These are sophisticated cases, we evaluate the demand letter history and settlement record carefully.
Talk to DylanBad faith cases run on policy expertise, claim-handling standards, and the same medical and financial proof that supports the underlying claim. Dylan has spent nine years building the experts who get these cases over the line.
Former adjusters, claims supervisors, and insurance-industry consultants who can testify to what reasonable claim handling looks like, and where this carrier departed from it. Without this testimony, the "unreasonable" standard is hard to anchor. With it, the bad faith case has spine.
Your treating physicians and specialists who establish the medical necessity of treatment, the causation of injury, and the projected future care, the same record that often refutes the carrier's "objective evidence" demands or experimental-treatment denials.
Forensic economists and vocational experts who calculate the full value of denied benefits, lost income from delayed payment, and consequential damages flowing from the carrier's bad faith conduct. Especially relevant in UM/UIM and other long-arc claims.
Bad faith cases are won on documentation, every email, every requested form, every shifting reason for denial. The steps below build the paper trail that the statute rewards.
Emails, letters, voicemails, claim portal messages, everything. Save the denial letter with the exact stated reason. Save every document request. Save every demand to re-submit something already submitted. The paper trail is the case.
If a denial came over the phone, request the specific reason in writing, citing the policy provision the carrier is relying on. Verbal denials are easy to walk back. Written denials lock the carrier into a position they have to defend.
Request the full declaration page, the policy form, every endorsement, and the schedule of coverages. Carriers sometimes apply exclusions or definitions the policy doesn't actually contain, or that don't apply to your situation. The full policy is essential reading for any bad faith analysis.
If the carrier offers a partial settlement or asks you to sign a release in exchange for paying part of the claim, do not sign. Releases are designed to extinguish your right to pursue further recovery, including any bad faith claim. Bring it to counsel first.
When you submitted the claim. When the carrier acknowledged it. When they requested documents. When they said they'd respond and didn't. Colorado treats unreasonable delay as a violation in itself, and the dates establish the delay.
If a denied medical, UM/UIM, or property coverage forces you into out-of-pocket payment, missed treatment, or financial hardship, document it. These are consequential damages that flow from the carrier's bad faith conduct, recoverable in addition to the underlying benefit.
If the carrier requests a second recorded statement, an "independent" medical examination, or an Examination Under Oath after the claim has already been pending for a meaningful period, that is often itself a delay tactic. Decline politely until you have counsel.
Carriers count on policyholders walking away after a denial. Reply in writing, ask for reconsideration, request a supervisor review. Each round of carrier conduct adds to the bad faith record, the more obstruction in writing, the stronger the eventual case.
Colorado allows two years to file a statutory bad faith claim. Common law bad faith claims have their own timeline. These deadlines are not extended by ongoing carrier "review" or settlement discussion, waiting too long can cost the case entirely.
Bad faith cases reward early involvement. A demand letter and proper documentation framework, sent at the right moment, often resolves the underlying claim and avoids litigation entirely, while still preserving the bad faith claim if the carrier doesn't move. Call 877-2929-LAW for a free case evaluation.
The carrier takes weeks or months to acknowledge the claim, schedule examinations, or issue a decision, while your medical bills pile up and your other coverage runs out. Colorado treats unreasonable delay as a stand-alone violation, not just a precursor to denial.
An offer that's a fraction of the documented damages, designed to make a settlement attractive when you can't afford to wait. Especially common in UM/UIM and Med-Pay contexts where the carrier knows medical bills are accumulating.
A denial first based on one policy provision, then another, then "lack of documentation," then "pre-existing condition." Each shift is a signal the carrier doesn't have a real basis, and each one strengthens the bad faith case.
Endless requests to re-submit documents already provided, fill out forms in different formats, or attend additional examinations, designed to wear down the policyholder. Documentation of repeat requests is some of the strongest bad faith evidence available.
The opposite tactic, denying a claim without doing the basic investigation Colorado law requires. Failing to interview witnesses, failing to obtain the police report, failing to review submitted medical records. The lack of investigation itself can establish unreasonableness.
Citing exclusions that don't apply, applying definitions the policy doesn't contain, or claiming the policy "doesn't cover that" when it clearly does. A side-by-side reading of the policy and the denial letter often reveals the misrepresentation cleanly.
Colorado courts have confirmed that the statutory bad faith remedy under § 10-3-1116 and the common law bad faith claim are separate causes of action that can be pled together, and that a successful claim under one does not preclude recovery under the other. The combined exposure often substantially exceeds what the carrier would have paid if it had simply honored the original claim.
After enough cases, the same patterns repeat. If your claim feels like one of these, that's not a coincidence, it's the playbook. And the playbook is exactly what the statute was written to punish.
Every time you submit what was asked for, the carrier requests something else. Different format, different signature, different supporting record. The substance never moves. This pattern is one of the most documentable forms of unreasonable delay, and one of the cleanest bad faith fact patterns.
The carrier demands an Independent Medical Examination with their own selected physician, timed and structured to produce a report that supports denial. When the IME contradicts treating physicians without proper basis, it becomes evidence of bad faith, not insulation from it.
An offer pegged at a fraction of documented damages, presented as the carrier's "final" position with an artificial deadline. Designed to pressure policyholders who can't afford to wait. Documentation that the offer was wildly inconsistent with the documented loss establishes unreasonableness.
Repeated requests for recorded statements early in the claim, hoping to get a quote that can be replayed against the policyholder later, or to extract an admission that minimizes the claim. After the first statement, additional ones are almost always a delay or denial tactic.
A denial that cites an exclusion the policy doesn't contain, or that doesn't apply to the facts. A clean side-by-side of the policy and the denial letter usually reveals the misrepresentation. This pattern is especially common in UM/UIM and homeowner's claims.
A carrier "still reviewing" your claim as the statute of limitations approaches, then denying just before the deadline runs. The carrier is hoping you won't realize you've nearly lost your right to file. Tracking deadlines from the day of submission protects against this entirely.
Free consultation. Lower fee. Direct attorney access from day one, we file the demand letter that often resolves the underlying claim before litigation starts.
Estimates only. Your final recovery is reduced by case costs, medical liens, and other legal obligations. Every case is different. Fees and costs are discussed at consultation.
Get a Free Consultation
